tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1078300522122110329.post5066810131498528536..comments2020-01-31T18:24:23.959-08:00Comments on Biblical Science News: A Thousand Years is Like a Dayauldaneyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06908311687965343448noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1078300522122110329.post-31429234156430597932020-01-31T18:24:23.959-08:002020-01-31T18:24:23.959-08:00Carbon Dating does not prove millions of years. It...Carbon Dating does not prove millions of years. It only dates things in thousands of years. And it is found in all fossils proving they are not millions of years old but rather thousands of years. And soft organic remains in fossils also proves they are thousands of years old also. As for the other radioactive methods they all give different dates for the same rock. And when the date is known to be recent, it dates it as millions of years old. Radioactive dating is a fraud!auldaneyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06908311687965343448noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1078300522122110329.post-56456796324549215852020-01-31T18:17:52.887-08:002020-01-31T18:17:52.887-08:00If that was true then God lied about creating it i...If that was true then God lied about creating it in six days. And it would make the days of Genesis a lie also.auldaneyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06908311687965343448noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1078300522122110329.post-21262698729363342242017-02-06T12:07:18.525-08:002017-02-06T12:07:18.525-08:00No carbon dating is the only radioactive method th...No carbon dating is the only radioactive method that comes close to being right. However, assumptions based on lawyer Charles Lyell's (Liar Liar) uniformitarianism speculation are wrong. The past was not like the present. The world had no cosmic radiation before the radiation shield collapsed during the worldwide cataclysm of the Deluge in 2347 BC. <br />A critical assumption used in carbon-14 dating has to do with this ratio. It is assumed that the ratio of 14C to 12C in the atmosphere has always been the same as it is today (1 to 1 trillion). If this assumption is true, then the AMS 14C dating method is valid up to about 80,000 years. Beyond this number, the instruments scientists use would not be able to detect enough remaining 14C to be useful in age estimates. This is a critical assumption in the dating process. If this assumption is not true, then the method will give incorrect dates. What could cause this ratio to change? If the production rate of 14C in the atmosphere is not equal to the removal rate (mostly through decay), this ratio will change. In other words, the amount of 14C being produced in the atmosphere must equal the amount being removed to be in a steady state (also called “equilibrium”). If this is not true, the ratio of 14C to 12C is not a constant, which would make knowing the starting amount of 14C in a specimen difficult or impossible to accurately determine.<br /><br />Dr. Willard Libby, the founder of the carbon-14 dating method, assumed this ratio to be constant. His reasoning was based on a belief in evolution, which assumes the earth must be billions of years old. Assumptions in the scientific community are extremely important. If the starting assumption is false, all the calculations based on that assumption might be correct but still give a wrong conclusion.<br /><br />In Dr. Libby’s original work, he noted that the atmosphere did not appear to be in equilibrium. This was a troubling idea for Dr. Libby since he believed the world was billions of years old and enough time had passed to achieve equilibrium. Dr. Libby’s calculations showed that if the earth started with no 14C in the atmosphere, it would take up to 30,000 years to build up to a steady state (equilibrium).<br /><br />If the cosmic radiation has remained at its present intensity for 20,000 or 30,000 years, and if the carbon reservoir has not changed appreciably in this time, then there exists at the present time a complete balance between the rate of disintegration of radiocarbon atoms and the rate of assimilation of new radiocarbon atoms for all material in the life-cycle.2<br />Dr. Libby chose to ignore this discrepancy (nonequilibrium state), and he attributed it to experimental error. However, the discrepancy has turned out to be very real. The ratio of 14C /12C is not constant.<br /><br />The Specific Production Rate (SPR) of C-14 is known to be 18.8 atoms per gram of total carbon per minute. The Specific Decay Rate (SDR) is known to be only 16.1 disintegrations per gram per minute.3<br />What does this mean? If it takes about 30,000 years to reach equilibrium and 14C is still out of equilibrium, then maybe the earth is not very old.<br /><br />Magnetic Field of the Earth<br />Other factors can affect the production rate of 14C in the atmosphere. The earth has a magnetic field around it which helps protect us from harmful radiation from outer space. This magnetic field is decaying (getting weaker). The stronger the field is around the earth, the fewer the number of cosmic rays that are able to reach the atmosphere. This would result in a smaller production of Carbon 14 in the atmosphere in earth’s past.auldaneyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06908311687965343448noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1078300522122110329.post-70618561933751460862017-02-02T13:38:28.484-08:002017-02-02T13:38:28.484-08:00I have thought about this for some time now, or on...I have thought about this for some time now, or one carbon dating is a farce, but lets just say for a second the science community is correct with there belief that the earth is millions of years old, my answer to that would be the matter of which God used to create the world was millions of years old but life or mankind is only 6000 years old...Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14463132345399425105noreply@blogger.com