Biblical Science News

The Inland Empire Creation Science Association presents  Dr. Joseph Kezele, B.A. Russian, M.D., U of A speaking on   “ You’ve Come a Long Way, Baby!" The amazing details of design in birth! Dr. Kezele will be discussing the transition from prenatal to postnatal circulation. This presentation discusses the physical changes that must occur in the circulatory system for a baby to make from life in the womb to the outside world. Demonstrating the irreducible complexity of the mammalian system of giving birth that cannot happen without supernatural design. A medical case is presented with a surprise ending, and the relevance of all of this to Genesis. Joseph earned his medical degree at the College of Medicine University of Arizona and is currently an assistant biology professor at Arizona Christian University. Courses he has taught over the years include Biology, Anatomy and Physiology, Cell and Molecular Biology, Microbiology, Human Genetics, and Ecology. Well ver...

Comments on my video on YouTube from an atheist. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9KwgzC5BX98 Shaun Haggerty  I don’t know where did you get that idea from? Science is about evidential research, controlled experiments and data which provide evidence in support of a hypothesis. All “biblical science” has is a book written by some primitive Neolithics who knew almost nothing about anything. Ultimately those who have religious beliefs rely on “faith” because there is no independently verifiable evidence for the existence of any god. I would be happy to accept the existence of god if presented with evidence of its existence. My education and reading tell me that there is no such proof and therefore I am atheist. Manage Like Show more reactions  ·  Reply  ·  1h  ·  Edited Shaun Haggerty  Jeremy Auldaney , oh dear I’m terribly sorry, I now see that you are a creationist. No point in starting a conversation with someone who believes the ear...

The Inland Empire Creation Science Association presents David Phillipps, M.A. speaking on DESIGN REVISITED WHAT'S ALL THE WHINE ABOUT DESIGN? AN UPDATE, A RESPONSE on August 29, 2017. Here is my response: There is more to design in nature. Atheistic evolutionists claim it is only the appearance of design.  But nature does not show a random processes like drawing letters out of a hat at random that spell cat, hat, and dog. These are not words, they are random and have no purpose or meaning. These are random letters that have no more meaning than ead, fyz, dkj. Also this example of drawing letters might fool some into thinking if there were an infinite number of letters and millions of years they would develop purpose. But drawing letters that accidently spell simple words cannot compare to the billions of things that go into nature's extremely complex designs, would be like writing a whole encyclopedia by drawing random letters. Every time it stops producing meaning you woul...

The Inland Empire Creation Science Association  presents: David Phillipps, M.A.  speaking on DESIGN REVISITED WHAT'S ALL THE WHINE ABOUT DESIGN?  AN UPDATE, A RESPONSE. Creationists have always believed that there is evidence of a designed universe (Romans 1:20). However, starting in the late 1980's and early 1990's a new movement began, the intelligent design movement which scientifically researches the observational facts that prove design could not happen by a random process without intelligent direction. By the early 2000's several examples of designed biological systems had been argued for. These were thought to show irreducible complexity and specified complexity, marks of intelligent purposeful design. However, evolutionists responded very negatively to this idea, arguing that I.D. is wrong and that several examples of "poor design" exist. Now creationists and I.D. proponents have thoroughly refuted this backlash and presented even ...

Thank you John Worrall for the donation to Biblical Science News Ministry. http://joelvelasco.net/teaching/3330/Worrall%201989%20Structural%20Realism%20.pdf Structural Realism: The Best of Both Worlds? * by John WORRALL** Summary The main argument for scientific realism is that our present theories in science are so successful empirically that they can’t have got that way by chance - instead they must somehow have latched onto the blueprint of the universe. The main argument against scientific realism is that there have been enormously successful theories which were once accepted but are now regarded as false. The central question addressed in this paper is whether there is some reasonable way to have the best of both worlds: to give the argument from scientific revolutions its full weight and yet still adopt some sort of realist attitude towards presently accepted theories in physics and elsewhere. I argue that there is such a way - through structural realism, a position ado...