Structural Realism in place of Speculation

Thank you John Worrall for the donation to Biblical Science News Ministry.

http://joelvelasco.net/teaching/3330/Worrall%201989%20Structural%20Realism%20.pdf

Structural Realism: The Best of Both Worlds? * by John WORRALL** Summary The main argument for scientific realism is that our present theories in science are so successful empirically that they can’t have got that way by chance - instead they must somehow have latched onto the blueprint of the universe. The main argument against scientific realism is that there have been enormously successful theories which were once accepted but are now regarded as false. The central question addressed in this paper is whether there is some reasonable way to have the best of both worlds: to give the argument from scientific revolutions its full weight and yet still adopt some sort of realist attitude towards presently accepted theories in physics and elsewhere. I argue that there is such a way - through structural realism, a position adopted by Poincar C, and here elaborated and defended.