False Information on Tuba City Dinosaur Tracks

    The gammasusie.com gives false information on the dinosaur track site at Tuba City, Arizona which I researched and publish technical papers on.

    Their web site does not allow comments, so I am posting it here.

    She says they found fossil fish eggs, dinosaur dung (coprolites), and plants. This is wrong! These are nodules created by oozing sand that hardened in treelike burrows before the sediment hardened, and exposed by erosion thousands of years later.  

    In the Tuba City Kayenta strata there are only freshwater articulated Unio clams, rare petrified reptile and dinosaur bones, possible phytosaur and Dilophosaur teeth, petrified wood (part of the Araucarian pine trees found in the Petrified 'forest' Triassic strata, showing that the Permian and Triassic is the same horizon and same strata layer misidentified by evolutionists. These body fossils are on top of a flat layer of dinosaur trackways of large 12 inch and small 5 inch tracks of bipedal theropod Dilophosaurs. The track layer was covered with a foot thick rainbow colored volcanic ash layer, then crossbeded red sandstone.

    The American Navajo Natives encourage the white man creationist myth, that there are human tracks here. 

    I am the senior paleontological researcher for the Creation Research Society's research project published in the Creation Research Society Quarterly. My updated conclusions are in my book Mysteries of History Revealed Part 1.

    There were putative human and dinosaur tracks on mounds of sandstone on top of this flat dinosaur track layer. On this exposed flat layer I discovered a human size hand print among juvanile Dilophosaur tracks over from the mounds in the exposed flat layer. 

    All fossil tracks I have observed are in FLAT layers. Also all fossiliferous strata worldwide are flat layers showing they were layed down rapidly by a huge flood. 

    In updating this article I discovered that no one seems to know if some dinosaurs actually had hands that could be used to hold things like some mammels with fingures and an opposing thumb.

Just now I came across the picture of the first Dilophosaur discovered. It said it HAD an opposing thumb!

Here is a more recent reconstruction cast.

     The head was missing replaced here with a replica from another Dilophosaur discovered later in China. 

    My books:

https://www.amazon.com/s?k=auldaney&i=stripbooks&ref=nb_sb_noss