Fossil Birds Refute Evolution

“HESPERORNITHIFORMS: THE FIRST MARINE BIRDS,” –presented by Dr. Alyssa Bell, Postdoctoral Research Associate. 

Dr. Bell’s research focuses primarily on avian evolution and the use of phylogenetics to study aquatic bird diversity.

Historical science (geology, paleontology, ect.) is based on deductive reasoning, as opposed to observational science (chemestry, mathematics, etc.) based on inductive reasoning by observation of facts. 

https://www.livescience.com/21569-deduction-vs-induction.html
"Deductive reasoning, or deduction, starts out with a general statement, or hypothesis, and examines the possibilities to reach a specific, logical conclusion, according to California State University. The scientific method uses deduction to test hypotheses and theories. "In deductive inference, we hold a theory and based on it we make a prediction of its consequences. That is, we predict what the observations should be if the theory were correct. We go from the general — the theory — to the specific — the observations," said Dr. Sylvia Wassertheil-Smoller, a researcher and professor emerita at Albert Einstein College of Medicine."

This kind of resoning is misused by assuming the hypotheses are true accepted facts, thus the theory is a fact, and ignores any facts that don't fit, because they must be wrong.

According to Utah State University. 

"In inductive inference, we go from the specific to the general. We make many observations, discern a pattern, make a generalization, and infer an explanation or a theory," Wassertheil-Smoller told Live Science. "In science, there is a constant interplay between inductive inference (based on observations) and deductive inference (based on theory), until we get closer and closer to the 'truth,' which we can only approach but not ascertain with complete certainty." 

Now this would be true if scientists were not biased and did not hold preconceived conclusions. However, the establishment has preconceived conclusions based on political beliefs forced on students by peer pressure and riducule (Communist Saul Alinsky's brainwashing plan) and loss of respect and funding if you disagree. The assumed conclusions are repeated over and over till it is believed to be a fact. Hitler said a lie repeated over and over will be believed. What do evolutionists do, they say over and over? Dinosaurs lived millions of years ago.

Miss Bell’s research is a typical evolution biased interpretation of the paleontological evidence, sponsored by Dinosaur Institute of the Los Angeles Natural History Museum.

Most people don’t know that there are two ways of looking at the historical sciences. Historical sciences are not like physics, mathematics, and chemistry. No one can observe, repeat, or experiment on the events of the past in geology, archaeology, or paleontology. So scientists start with a hypothesis: either the events of the past were natural processes and did not involve intelligence, or they were created by an intelligence. One is evolution, the other creation. Evolution assumes everything including the beginnings of everything (origins) were entirely mechanical starting with a big bang from nothing resulting in the spontaneous creation of complex designs that only resemble intelligent design. There is no scientific experiments from laboratory research that supports this. Design only comes from intelligent design, not random natural events. Also the desitgn we see in nature is purposeful design. Not just the appearence of a purpose.

Many people may not realize that there are three belief systems that determine our understanding of the universe. These preconceived beliefs blind us to alternative viewpoints which produce different conclusions. The best place to start is with the facts. Inductive reasoning. Like a puzzle they fit together which point to the correct conclusion. In a court they call this the preponderance of the evidence weighs toward the truth.

Let’s take a look at the misinterpretation and ignored facts to see the truth in the research on Hesperornis.

Hesperornis is an extinct kind of aquatic bird that lives in water and cannot fly. 

•  Lived in what is now mainly North America, and other places.
• Fossils found in Late Cretaceous rocks below the KT Cretaceous boundary. Became extinct with the dinosaurs.
• Was almost as long as a man is tall, about 6 feet.
• Couldn’t Fly.
• Was a Piscivore (Eats fish)

Other Hesperornithiforms have been assumed to be other species without definitive proof. Paleontologists have a tendency to create new names for every find they make.

Like paleontologist Jack Horner naming Maiasaura when in fact it is the most common dinosaur, the Duckbilled Hadrosaur.

There are so called other species of Hesperornis found in Europe, Mongolia, and Kazakhstan.

In Kansas they were three-dimensional mineralized petrified bone fragments discovered by the paleontologist Marsh in the 1800s. He did find a rare skull. In Europe they were compressed flat in shale commonly found with soft tissue! Including skin impressions and feathers.

Feathers, and bird trackways are also commonly found in the Eocene Green River Formation in Wyoming, Colorado and Utah. 

In fact the Eocene Green River Formation is identical to the Miocene shale in Anaheim Hills Orange County, Chino, and Lompoc. I found a bird feather in Anaheim Hills. Evidence indicates that the Eocene and Miocene may be the same deposit misidentified by evolutionary geologists/paleontologists. Only creationists can see the truth sometimes.

Forensics shows that a dead body immediately starts to decompose at the moment of death from microorganisms inside their bodies. Any kind of preservation (lack of oxygen, etc.) cannot stop this process. It is a mystery how most petrified fossils have preserved soft tissue including blood, blood vessels, collagen, proteins, and bone cells.

There is nothing known that can explain this. Research by Mary Schweitzer (The discoverer of dinosaur soft tissue)  to find out how 80 million year old soft tissue could survive has suggested iron did it, but there are numerous reasons why this could not be the case. Because professional evolutionists cannot accept the obvious, that dinosaurs are not millions of years old. Speculative theory is a fact, they ignore the evidence.

I remember at the Jurupa Hills Discovery Center in Riverside the evolutionist Ruth told us there was preserved wood inside petrified wood. 

Ruth and Sam Kirkby founded the earth science museum. Years later the board of directors, funded by the city and donations, voted them out of their own corporation.

Here is a comment from the discoverer of soft tissue Dr. Schweitzer, “In what order are those genes expressed? What chromosomes are they lined upon?,” asks evolutionary biologist Mary Schweitzer, an expert in extracting proteins from dinosaur fossils and a graduate student of paleontologist Jack Horner. 

On the other hand Jack Horner disagrees with his student.

Here is a comment by Jack Horner that will interest you: https://www.montana.edu/news/16135/jack-horner-evolving

“I think developmental biology is the future of paleontology and most other evolutionary sciences. I think we are not far from being able to resurrect extinct species, or to even make new kinds of animals.”

He seems to disagree with his student Dr. Miss Bell who does not see us creating dinosaurs by genetic engineering. However many evolutionists believe we can guide our own evolution. 

I agree, Horner is right. Horner is referring to Area 51 type of black project research where they are creating genetically engineered species. I believe it is possible that they could create human animal hybrids (Chimerah) that resemble aliens in preparation for the future invasion by fake aliens, in support of evolution and the coming world government of Antichrist. The New World Order!

Wikepedia says, The Chimera (/kɪˈmɪərə/ or /kaɪˈmɪərə/, also Chimaera (Chimæra); Greek: Χίμαιρα, Chímaira "she-goat") according to Greek mythology,^[1] was a monstrous fire-breathing hybridcreature of Lycia in Asia Minor, composed of the parts of more than one animal. It is usually depicted as a lion, with the head of a goat arising from its back, and a tail that might end with a snake's head,^[2] and was one of the offspring of Typhon and Echidna and a sibling of such monsters as Cerberus and the Lernaean Hydra.

It is interesting that Horner avoids research into Carbon 14 commonly found in all petrified fossils which supports the dating by soft tissue of a young earth. Carbon 14 is like organic substances and can be used to date fossils. And it also shows they are thousands of years old not millions.

Also the rate of genetic mutations can be a dating method. Genetics is breaking down at a certin rate and can be determined. 

What about other radiometric methods? Do they prove fossils are millions of years old? These radiometric methods have all been found to be totally useless. No matter the age of the volcanic rock they come out dated in millions of years. And each method gives a different date for the same rock! For example the lava from the 1980 eruption at Mt Saint Helens dates to several million years!

Of course Dr. Bell supported the assumption that birds are dinosaurs and at one point referred to it. She called the birds marine dinosaurs. I have said this before, “We are in trouble when dinosaur experts can’t tell the difference between a dinosaur and a canary.”

Both dinosaurs and birds lived at the same time and most birds became extinct at the same time. And birds are designed entirely differently. One for terrestrial life, the other for flying. Of course there are exceptions among terrestrial birds, and marine birds. But unlike a random process, they show amazing design to fit their environment. They would die if there were any changes.  And this explains why so many organisms became extinct after the worldwide cataclysm when weather changed when a shower of huge asteroids struck the whole earth.

Evolutionists claim mass extinctions cause evolutionary changes (puncuated equilibria).

When paleontologists found strange creatures in the1800s they called them dinosaurs, and assumed that living things changed over time into something else. Actually all fossils are either almost identical to modern organisms (living fossil coined by Darwin), or they are extinct. There is no evidence that the fossil forms survived in different forms. There are missing links between every different kind and Family. And this means there is NO evidence of evolution. One exception is many are larger than today’s organisms, a contradiction to evolution.

As for the comments that these fossil birds are primitive is not true. Hesperornis was amazingly designed to live in the water and live off fish. There are no primitive organisms. The oldest creature is a trilobite. And they are amazingly designed. They can see three dimensionally to tell distance with complex eyes better than many modern creatures.

http://www.create.ab.ca/the-trilobite-eye-a-wonder-of-complex-design/

”Some of the first preserved fossils were trilobites. Most paleontologists thus consider trilobites to be one of the most ancient (primitive) of known fossil groups. Fortunately, a large number of well-preserved examples exist, which allows a detailed study of the animal. As a result, much is known about its well-designed, complex eye. New research on the workings of the trilobite eye shows that it is far more complex and better designed than thought even just a few years ago. Such a discovery is contrary to evolution theory. It did not need to evolve into anything. In fact it didn’t.” In fact they have better eyes than many modern organisms supposedly.

The picture of the trilobite at the bottom is coiled like a pill bug. This is common and shows that it it protecting itself when threatened. This indicates it was buried during a cataclysm.  Fossil clams show the same thing, their valves are closed and are found at all fossil sites. Clams (bi valves) are found all around dinosaur bones.

Hesperornis is similar to living Grebes, Cormorants, and diving Ducks. The fossil bones of the fossil bird are similar to these living birds so they are used for comparison.  

One problem is Hesperornis was 6 feet long. All modern birds are about a foot or two. Evolution can only go from small to large, not the other way around. Also there are no transitional forms (missing links) between the fossils and living birds. And there are no ancestors to these birds. All Hesperornis are found in a tiny part of the Late Cretaceous. There is no link to other fossil birds like Archaeopteryx, which was a strong flyer shown by its aerodynamic feathers.

Confuciusornis from China controdict evolution.  This bird is commonly sold in mineral/fossil shows.

Wikipedia: “Confuciusornis is a genus of primitive (Really?) crow-sized birds from the Early Cretaceous Period of the Yixian and Jiufotang Formations of China, dating from 125 to 120 million years ago. Like modern birds, Confuciusornis had a toothless beak, but close relatives of modern birds such as Hesperornis and Ichthyornis were toothed, indicating that the loss of teeth occurred convergently in Confuciusornis and living birds. It is the oldest known bird to have a beak.” 

So Confucianis was older and more advanced than other fossil birds.

This bird is supposedly older than Hesperornis by millions of years. However, Hesperornis has teeth like most fossil birds like Archaeopteryx, because they ate fish. But Confuciusornis had no teeth or a long bony tail. It looks like a modern bird with a break! This does not fit the evolution scenario. In fact it could actually be a modern crow! But evolutionists would never admit this.

A few Grebes can fly, but are not good at it. Some cannot fly at all.

Here is a Greb.

Below is a video of Grebes in a mating dance.

https://www.allaboutbirds.org/guide/Western_Grebe/media-browser/455564

Unlike the Grebes and Hesperornis, the Cormorants can fly and walk on land. But they are better designed for being in the water. Their wings are designed short so they can be streamlined to swim fast after fish and avoiding predators.

Paleontologists try to find things in the present that they can observe to interpret what they find in the rocks.  So they compare these different but similar birds.

Many fossil birds have bird teeth to eat fruit and some like the Hesperornis for catching fish.

Dr. Bell’s graphs show that each of these birds are different. And in the Genus Hesperornis there are several species.

Evolutionists tend to be splitters, to fit their assumptions of life forms evolving over time. However it is very difficult to determine if a new find is a new species or not. And Dr. Bell admitted this. So since there are no complete skeletons, and most are fragments of limb bones, there is no way to be sure.

Also one person asked if the differences could be adaptations to different environments, and she agreed that it was likely. Since some favor salt water and others are fresh water.

Of course she assumed that the differences between different assumed species and living birds was caused by their evolution.

The fact is each Genus is amazingly designed for their environment. The mind-blowing complexity of every element of different living organisms shows that it required intelligent design for a particular environment. There are no mistakes in nature. And this shows that these different kinds of a similar organism are not evolving into something else.

Recent research is showing that organisms have preplanned adaptations built into their genetic structure and are not evolving new design by a natural random process. Creation scientists believe adaptations do exist, however new discoveries by secular scientists is showing, adaptations are not caused by the environment, but rather by mechanisms designed into systems in organisms to help the organism to survive when there are changes to the environment. Evolution cannot allow any preplanned changes, they must be caused by the random effects of the environment. They cannot allow any designer into the picture.