Theistic Evolution The False Prophet

      Fake News is also supporting Fake Science.  The False Prophets at BioLogos pretend to be Christians (Like Hugh Ross) who believe God is only a glorified man who requires billions of years to create the universe and the earth by trial and error.       Why God created man a few thousand years ago is not explained.

       This web site are liars. The plan of the New World Order (The world government of Antichrist) by the Priory de Scion states that they will use Darwinism/Marxism to undermine faith. And it is promoted by the Communist teachers unions who support Critical race Theory and Evolution. And they have removed god from our schools. The theory of evolution started in Ancient Egypt among the Pagan Nephilim who believed man evolved from seaweed in the Nile River.

       Notice they make statements that the evidence is overwhelming that the earth is old, but give no evidence for it. They expect you to believe what atheistic scientists or theistic evolutionists say. Just like they want us to believe Dr. Fauci and Biden about global warming and Covid mandates.

       “Darwin resented the biblical doctrine of future judgment He wrote, 'I can indeed hardly see how anyone ought to wish Christianity to be true; for if so the plain language of the text seems to show that the men who do not believe, and this would include my Father, Brother and almost all my best friends, will be everlastingly punished.”

       And his family were Masons the Illuminati behind the New World Order of Antichrist. And Masons were supporting evolution before Darwin wrote his books.

       Everyone who has supported evolution hated God.

        And the Bible clearly shows that the universe was created in 6 days about 6 thousand years ago. You have to read millions or billions of years into it. In my books Mysteries of History Revealed Part 1 and part 2 gives tons of evidence from secular science that proves evolution and long ages is a hoax by agents of Satan so that people would accept the world government as part of evolution. Evolution requires long ages. But there is no evidence proving and ancient earth. I refute this in my books with references from secular scientists. Science proves any genetic improvements cannot go from simple to complex. And if it did happen it would be destroyed by entropy. Everything deteriorates it does not improve without a creator. And a creator that created time and space does not need time.

       Here are the lies from BioLogos who contradict the facts of science and the Word of God. They represent the False Prophet.

       “Despite the facts that young-Earth creationism has become considerably more sophisticated and that some of its proponents are much more geologically knowledgeable than were earlier advocates like Price or Morris (That is a lie), the claims advanced in favor of a young Earth or of Flood geology remain unacceptable to the scientific community (Establishment scientists are mostly atheist/materialists. Evolution and an old earth are naturalistic explanations). Thus their claims should also be unacceptable within the church (Yes Satan always wants to infect the church under the False Prophet), which, of all places ought to be committed to truth and reality (The liar always accuses the innocent person of doing what they are doing. Just like Hillary who was involved in Russian collusion blaming Trump)—for the simple reason that the young-Earth creationist claims lack scientific credibility (From an unbelievers viewpoint). They neither discredit evidence (Liar, I discredited old earth and evolution in my books in detail from scientific witnesses. And the Bible) for an old Earth nor compel acceptance of a young Earth or a global Flood.” (Lie again)

       Without question, any purely materialistic philosophy is hostile to Christianity (The Antichrist will also be a theistic evolutionist) and ought to be opposed by (Ignorant) Christians. Christians should not, however, attempt to disprove a materialistic evolutionary theory by discrediting the antiquity of the Earth. (The evolutionists are losing the evolution hypothesis so they are going back to ancient Paganism and the occult supporting the ancient earth theory. But they are lying when they say they don’t believe in evolution) Evolutionary materialism and the antiquity of the Earth are two distinct issues. (Another lie, evolution requires an ancient earth. But science and logic show a random process is impossible with entropy and the second law of thermodynamics) If the vast antiquity of the Earth is amply demonstrated, (No it hasn’t. Read my book Part 1) one must still evaluate the data and theory of evolution on their own scientific merits. (Of course ignore the Bible.) By way of example, Hugh Ross, an astrophysicist, and C. John Collins, an Old Testament theologian, are both enthusiastic advocates of an old Earth who, nevertheless, ardently oppose biological evolution. (They are lying. Hugh Ross on Focus on the Family radio said they expected to find only very little dust on the moon. Liar, no scientists thought there would be so much dust that the lander might sink into the dust. They couldn’t even get the flag to stand up it fell as they blasted off)

       We agree that many sedimentary rocks around the world do contain features that were produced by very rapid or catastrophic deposition. (Yes and most deposits of Jurassic, etc. are found worldwide. And all deposits are all dead level showing little erosion, unlike today. Proving they were rapid deposits one on top of another) But the premise is misleading because it tells only half of the truth. Many other sedimentary rocks around the world contain features that must result from extremely slow rates (No there are no fossil deposits that were deposited slowly. Including the La Brea asphalt shows rapid deposition by water and gravel. I proved this in a technical paper I published) of deposition. Any valid theory of the origin of sedimentary rocks must not ignore either of these groups of features. (All sedimentary rocks require rapidly moving water. The word sediment means water deposited. And most mammal and dinosaur bone beds are buried in volcanic ash by water)

       Geologists certainly accept the idea that the average rates of sedimentary depositional processes over long stretches of time are quite slow, (Another lie. They require rapidly moving water to carry the sediment and then bury and preserve bones and wood in volcanic ash) but it is also accepted that there may be brief, spasmodic episodes when rates of deposition may be extremely high, even catastrophic.

       Fossil accumulations contain internal evidences as to circumstances of deposition. (You mean the crossbeded red sandstone that was claimed to be windblown desert sand? In order to preserve trackways you need water and a cementing agent from volcanic sources) In some cases deposition is rapid, but in other cases the deposit may represent a “trap” that operated over time. (No the tar pit was not a trap. The bones were carried by water into the upwelling of asphalt at La Brea. As for the dinosaurs at the Cleveland Lloyd quarry in Utah, these dinosaurs were fleeing volcanic eruptions and flooding and got stuck in the volcanic ash. This was not a slow process)

       Twentieth-century young-Earth creationist authors often accuse geologists of piecing together the fossil record, (True. You cannot find many layers of the geologic column in one place. Usually there is only one. Sometimes you find 3 layers. So geologists/paleontologists have to assume there is a certain order based on their acceptance of the theoretical geologic column based on the acceptance of evolution) crazy-quilt style, to fit a preconceived notion of organic evolution. In effect, these modern critics claim that the pattern of fossils depicted in geology textbooks is a fiction, produced for evolutionary propaganda purposes. (That is correct. Fake Science based on materialism, forgetting the Creator)

       However, we saw in chapter four [not included in this series of excerpts] that the founders of biostratigraphy were actively sorting out the pattern of extinct life forms more than a generation prior (Yes sorting them out based on the assumption of simple to complex, which is illogical. Physical things go from complex to simple) to the publication of Darwin’s The Origin of Species, and were in fact indifferent or hostile to the concept of organic evolution. (Darwin/Huxley hated God) The pattern of preserved organic remains in rocks is an empirical one. (A lie. The kind of fossils is determined by direction of the current and the size of the object, the speed of the water, and the origin of the sediment. Sediment is sorted) Any valid theory of the history of the Earth must take into account this empirical pattern. (Liar. Making assumptions before seeing the evidence leads to false conclusions. And to call this empirical is a lie. Evolution has never been observed or proven. To start with it as a fact is unscientific)

       Because they have put on blinders, (Liars always accuse the innocent person of doing what they do) young-Earth creationists are unwilling to accept the totality of the available geologic evidence. (The totality of the geologic evidence proves evolution and deep time is false) They are unwilling to abandon their young-Earth, global-Flood hypothesis even when the evidence shows it to be untenable. (Liar. All the evidence supports creation and falsifies evolution) They have ignored or distorted a vast body of evidence that is contrary to their preconceived notion of what Earth history must have been like. (We ignore fictional stories like a small bipedal dinosaur could accidentally turn scales into a flying bird)  They have focused only on data that, taken in isolation from geologic contexts, (Just so stories, with no evidence, except circumstantial evidence that is interpreted better in support of creation) might be seen as favorable to their own theory.  They claim continually to argue from the evidence of nature, (I have collected every kind of fossil and discovered many fossil sites for decades and it supports creation and the worldwide flood, not evolution) but they have repeatedly ignored what is inconvenient for them. (No we ignore silly stories that a microbe turned into a man. You assume God must have evolved too, if he used evolution to create over vast amounts of time in trial and error. That means he is not God, he is an evolving being) Although some of the phenomena of the sedimentary rock record might be interpretable in terms of a great Flood, (No all the fossil record points to a worldwide flood, except for the post Cretaceous which was created in another worldwide cataclysm in the days of Peleg) most of the phenomena to which they appeal are far more satisfactorily explicable in terms of much smaller scale processes than a global catastrophic Flood. (Liar. The same fossils and sediment is found in strata worldwide. All fossil kinds are found worldwide in different layers. Many are from different environments which are biased to that environment. Classic example is the difference between marine and terrestrial fossils. But we know they were all deposited at the same time)

       My conclusions. The teaching of theistic evolution or deep time leads to young people coming to the conclusion that the bible can’t be trusted. We have to believe what man says. You know fallen man, or are you going to say that the Fall never happened?

        I remember reading in a book in a Christian Book Store. “Do we have to teach our children that the earth was created in 6 days 6 thousand years ago.” I could hear Satan whispering, “Yeah hath God said?”