Judge Roy Moore Evidence He Is Innocent
https://conservativetribune.com/court-docs-roy-moore-allegation/?utm_source=Email&utm_medium=newsletter&utm_campaign=dailypm&utm_content=conservative-tribune
Accusations
against Judge Roy Moore appear to be FAKE.
Her
accusations hinge on two points: First, that she was left alone with the
then-32-year-old attorney Roy Moore during a family court case… and second,
that she lived with her mother in Gadsden, Alabama, when Moore allegedly
harassed her.
Both of
those points have now been called into question. The Washington Post (an Illuminati owned newspaper) story
that originally outlined the case against Moore appears have have left some
major details out — details that bring new questions about the story itself.
TRENDING: Trump Thanks God,
the One Word Obama Refused to Say (Jeremy: Amen! Obama is Antichrist.)
“Regarding
the original court hearing where Corfman says that Moore asked her for her
number while Wells went inside the courtroom, the Post reported
that it ‘confirmed that her mother attended a hearing at the courthouse in
February 1979 through divorce records,'” explained Breitbart News.
That part is
a known fact. There was a court hearing involving Leigh Corfman and her
mother, Nancy Wells. However, the Post left out a glaring detail: It was a
custody case involving the 14-year-old girl, which means that there’s a good
chance Corfman was in the courtroom, not left with Moore.
Additionally,
the entire point of that court hearing was to give custody of the teenager to
her father. She went to live with him soon after, not at her mother’s Gadsden
house as the allegations claim.
According to
court records, Corfman’s father’s house was in a completely different town
called Ohatchee.
“This would
mean that from the court hearing on February 21, 1979, until Corfman was
ordered to move to her father’s house, Moore would only have had 12 days,
including the day of the court hearing, to have repeatedly called Corfman at
her mother’s Gadsden house, arrange two meetings, and attempt another. Moore
has strenuously denied the accusations,” reported Breitbart.
Oddly, the
fact that there was a window of just over 10 days for all of the alleged
incidents to have taken place was not raised by the (Jeremy: Lying Illuminati
owned) Washington Post’s article. Even more strangely, the change of custody
and living location is completely missing from the accounts of Moore’s accuser.
“Neither
Corfman nor Wells publicly mentioned the change in custody during the critical
period where Moore was said to have arranged meetings with Corfman outside her
mother’s home,” stated Breitbart.
A skeptic
might wonder why these seemingly major details were left out.
It gets even more odd. (Jeremy: Not strange at all. They are Fake News!)
Not only do
court records indicate that Corfman stopped living at her mother’s house during
the time frame of the accusations, but details provided by the accuser
simply don’t hold up to scrutiny.
For
instance, Leigh Corfman claims that Moore secretly called her on her
bedroom phone in her mother’s house to arrange a meeting. Remember, this was
1979, long before cell phones and even cordless home phones were commonplace.
“Wells, 71,
says that her daughter did not have a phone in her bedroom during the
period that Moore is reported to have allegedly called Corfman — purportedly on
Corfman’s bedroom phone,” stated Breitbart.
On that
apparently non-existent phone, the accuser claims she agreed to meet Moore at a
specific intersection “around the corner” from her house… a house where she no
longer lived.
Around
the corner —
remember that.
“The Post reports,
‘She says she talked to Moore on her phone in her bedroom, and they made plans
for him to pick her up at Alcott Road and Riley Street, around the corner from
her house,'” summarized Breitbart.
Problem: It
isn’t anywhere near “around the corner” from her house.
“[T]hat
intersection was almost a mile away from her mother’s house at the time and
would have been across a major thoroughfare,” Breitbart continued.
Let’s be
extremely clear: We don’t know with certainty whether the claims against Roy
Moore are true or not. Neither does anyone else, except the people directly
involved.
That is the
point: When an accusation is made, the first rule of our society and our laws
is that the accused are innocent until proven guilty.
What we do
know is that the timing of these accusations is extremely odd. After decades of
Moore in the public light, these claims emerged with only weeks left in a key
election that the candidate seemed to be winning.
Comments
Post a Comment