Dinosaur Extinction Cannot Be Proven!

It is true that the average person does not see a rare events, but it does happen. However, the majority, the skeptics will assume it did not happen to keep their false version of reality.

Evolutionists have come up with a lot of phony ‘scientific names’ for Coelacanth fish to disguise the fact that this fish became extinct in the Cretaceous, but has survived unchanged till today.

It is true that people do not see dinosaurs, marine reptiles, and flying reptiles only on rare occasions and in remote areas. But no one can prove they are extinct today. Because animals live in different environments, and some live in remote areas where people do not frequent the area. Like the Coelacanth fish which became extinct in the Late Cretaceous. Or did it?

http://www.livingpterosaur.com/blog/2017/11/25/i-saw-a-flying-dinosaur/

Typical skeptical comment, “How could living pterosaurs, flying reptiles have gone undetected for so long?”

First, I see a contradiction: The reason a skeptic make a comment like that is because somebody has reported that they saw a living pterosaur. In other words, it was not only detected but it was reported, so the skeptic is completely wrong in assuming that apparent living pterosaurs have gone undetected.

But I think the skeptic actually means something different, notwithstanding it may appear to be similar. The critic, when he or she says something like the above question, probably assumes that any species of pterosaur that survived into the present day would have been discovered by one or more scientists before the day that the eyewitness (supposedly a non-scientist) reported the sighting in question. Not only that, but the skeptic probably assumes that when one scientist sees a living pterosaur then its existence will somehow automatically become common knowledge among scientists in general and the non-extinction of that species will become accepted by many scientists. How greatly would that skeptic be wrong! 

The reality is this: A scientist who reported seeing a living pterosaur would likely lose his or her position at a university or college or would lose his or her employment. (Jeremy: And be ridiculed into silence. Then he would remain silent. Like the scientist who said meteor crater was created by a meteorite impact, even though iron meteorites were found all over the area this fact was denied for over 50 years until 1955.)

Another reality of which a typical skeptic would be ignorant is this: The number of eyewitnesses, worldwide, who have seen an obvious living pterosaur is at least in the tens of thousands, and the number of persons who have had some kind of an encounter with a living pterosaur is at least between 7 million and 128 million. How enormous is the depth of ignorance of the typical skeptic who encounters one eyewitness report of a non-extinct pterosaur and quickly rejects it!