ExoPlanetary Evolution Fails

The New York Post tells us the latest facts that refute evolution.

https://nypost.com/2017/12/04/the-possibility-of-life-beyond-our-solar-system-just-got-a-lot-slimmer/

With the incredible number of galaxies that mankind can observe from its tiny little perch here in the Milky Way, we know there is an absolutely incredible number of planetary systems in the universe and that means the possibility that alien life has evolved elsewhere in the cosmos is quite good. (Jeremy: The speculation based on assumption that evolution occurred, based on the assumption that life and the ordered universe created itself by a natural process from nothing. And that God does not exist because nature is all that exists.) 

Unfortunately, new research suggests that some of the most promising places astronomers have been considering as potential life-supporting planets might not be all that friendly after all. (Jeremy: The Bible indicates that this is what they would find, because God created life on earth, not elsewhere, with the exception of angels who are not physical beings.)

Past observations have suggested that planets closely orbiting red dwarf stars are one of the prime candidates for Earth-like worlds. The rocky planets hanging out within the cool stars’ so-called habitable zone are much closer to 

Another problem is no water has been found on these evolution potential planets, and notice they are larger than earth and this would change the kind of gas in their atmosphere, and increased gravity would be a problem

their stars than Earth is to our sun, but because red dwarf stars are much cooler than our own, it seemed likely that the two factors would cancel each other out. Now, a pair of research papers published in Astrophysical Journal Letters reveals that there is likely another, even bigger problem to consider: stellar wind. (Jeremy: Confirmation that the earth only was specially created for life.)

“Traditional definition and climate models of the habitable zone consider only the surface temperature,” Chuanfei Dong, a space physicist and leader of the new research, explains. “But the stellar wind can significantly contribute to the long-term erosion and atmospheric loss of many exoplanets, so the climate models tell only part of the story.” (Jeremy: Typical circumstantial evidence for evolution, refuted by further discoveries which Bible believers knew all along.)

Stellar wind is the powerful, unceasing flow of particles flowing outward from a star. Earth is protected from brunt of the Sun’s wind by a magnetic field that surrounds the planet. The field, called a magnetosphere, deflects the majority of the stellar wind that could tear away at Earth’s atmosphere, but exoplanets orbiting close to red dwarf stars may not be nearly so lucky. (Jeremy: The fact that no other planet has been found to have a magnetosphere shows intelligent design. Strange that no magnetic field has been found like the earth, what an impossible coincidence.)

If any given exoplanet within the habitable zone of a red dwarf doesn’t have the same luxury of a magnetosphere — which is entirely dependent on the makeup of the planet — any would-be life-protecting atmosphere would likely be slowly stripped away before life even had a chance to take root. In short, the exoplanets where we’re hoping to find alien life might be the right temperature, but lack an atmosphere, which is a huge deal-breaker. (Jeremy: The fact that millions of UFOs have been proven to be visiting earth proves they do not come from another planet.)