Brett Kavanaugh and Fake News

Yahoo News passes on Fake News from Rockefeller owned newspapers and services. However, 90 % of the public response posted refutes their claims. It appears the Democrats are not convincing the public. The Silent Majority the mouse that roared (remember the book) are RORARING! 




Here is an example. Today there was an article from the Washington Post and USA Today (Liberal Propaganda) about Trump high court nominee denies new allegation as hearing looms
 WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A third woman came forward in a statement to a Senate panel made public on Wednesday accusing Brett Kavanaugh, President Donald Trump's U.S. Supreme Court nominee, of sexual misconduct in the 1980s, further inflaming an already contentious confirmation process. Kavanaugh immediately denied the allegation.


    • Avatar

Auldaney see BiblicalScienceNews.blogspot.com Sounds like Jesus trial when the same bloodline hired false witnesses. How come these loose women are coming forward now? Check their bank account for cash from Communist George Soros, or Clinton Foundation
  
  •  
    • Avatar

Let us review! Ford told her Husband and several friends 30 years after alleged incident took place. Ford sends a letter to her Senator about sic months ago but it was held back by the Sen. Now a copy of the typewritten letter has appeared and analysis by an expert indicates either Dr. Ford did not write/type the letter, it was alterred (different size fonts on different lines) and numerous simple errors in writing indicating a novice writer not a PHD composed and typed it. Let us see. If she is willing to raise her right hand and answer the tough questions without fear of ruining her career with a false statement under oath then we have something. Personally, I have thought all along it has been a series of delay tactics and she will not testify under oath. It’s the day before and we still hear about excuses for not appearing. By the way, I may be wrong, but, about 6 years ago the late Sen. from Arizona was the GOP nominee and considering Judge Kavanaugh for a running mate. Interesting?
  •  
    • Avatar

"include signed documents from Christine Blasey Ford's husband and three friends that her lawyers sent to the Senate Judiciary Committee." That isn't CORROBORATION! https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/corroborate The Definition is:: to support with evidence or authority : make more certain These are her own, inherently biased friends/relatives, with NO firsthand knowledge of the accusation, incident, nor anything pertaining to the circumstances thereof. The statements are nothing more than "well I know her and THINK this, signed Bob" That isn't even to the level of testimony, it is most certainly not evidence, and wouldn't even be considered admissible for or against her accusation more Fake News from the fakenews.
  •  
    • Avatar

"A woman who has accused President Donald Trump's U.S. Supreme Court nominee, Brett Kavanaugh, of sexual assault will present senators with sworn statements from four people to corroborate her allegations, her lawyers said on Wednesday." "The declarations, first reported by USA Today, include signed documents from Christine Blasey Ford's husband and three friends" Wait, last I heard, none of these people were there, and as far as I know, none knew Kavanaugh at the time. So, can anyone explain how these four "sworn statements" can "corroborate her allegations?" At best, they are hearsay, at worst they are total and complete BS.
  •  
    • Avatar

Interesting.....But her story is also growing less believable by the day. Here are eight reasons why it’s hardly “anti-woman” for senators to question her account at Thursday’s hearing: 1) For starters, Ford still can’t recall basic details of what she says was the most traumatic event in her life. Not where the “assault” took place — she’s not sure whose house it was, or even what street it was on. Nor when — she’s not even sure of the year, let alone the day and month. Ford’s not certain how old she was or what grade she was in when she says an older student violently molested her. (But she doesn’t plead inebriation: She described having just “one beer” at the party.) 2) Ford concedes she told no one what happened to her at the time, not even her best friend or mother. That means she can rely on no contemporaneous witness to corroborate her story. 3) Worse, the four other people she identified as attending the party, including Kavanaugh, all deny knowledge of the gathering in question, including Leland Ingham Keyser, who she calls a “lifelong friend.” Keyser’s lawyer told the Senate Judiciary Committee: “Simply put, Ms. Keyser does not know Mr. Kavanaugh and she has no recollection of ever being at a party or gathering where he was present, with or without Dr. Ford.” The other two potential witnesses — Mark Judge and Patrick “P.J.” Smyth — also deny any recollection of attending such a party. The committee took their sworn statements “under penalty of perjury.” “These witnesses directly contradict Professor Ford’s allegations against Judge Kavanaugh,” Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley advised Ford’s attorneys last week. Kavanaugh's accuser offers Senate 4 people to corroborate claims Second Kavanaugh accuser says she would testify at Senate hearing Why it was up to Trump to call bull on Kavanaugh allegations Democrats' 'investigation' calls are just code for delay Kavanaugh nomination vote rescheduled for Friday morning In her original letter to Sen. Dianne Feinstein, Ford claimed that Kavanaugh talked to Keyser and Smyth right after he assaulted her. Yet neither shares her memory. This is, to say the least, highly problematic for her case. No witness corroborates any part of her story. 4) Her own immediate family doesn’t appear to be backing her up, either. Her mother, father and two siblings are all conspicuously absent from a letter of support released by a dozen relatives, mostly on her husband’s side of the family. The letter attests to her honesty and integrity. “Why didn’t her parents and brothers sign the letter?” a congressional source familiar with the investigation wondered. 5) This summer, Ford tried to reach out to old friends from high school and college to jog her memory. They couldn’t help her. “I’ve been trying to forget this all my life, and now I’m supposed to remember every little detail,” Ford complained to one friend in July, according to an account in The San Jose Mercury News. 6) Yet she still pushed forward with her bombshell charge, contacting The Washington Post tip line and Democratic lawmakers, while hiring a Democratic activist lawyer. Ford is also a Democrat, as well as an anti-Trump marcher, raising questions about the motive and timing of the allegations along with their veracity. 7) Ford contends that notes her therapist took in 2012 corroborate her account. But they don’t mention Kavanaugh. They also point up inconsistencies in her story. For instance, her shrink noted that Ford told her there were “four boys” in the bedroom, not two as she now says. The notes also indicate Ford said she was in her “late teens” when she was assaulted. But Ford now says she may have been only 15. 8) In another inconsistency, Ford told The Washington Post she was upset when Trump won in 2016, because Kavanaugh was mentioned as a Supreme Court pick. But Kavanaugh wasn’t added to Trump’s list of possibles until November 2017, a full year later. On top of all that, Kavanaugh “unequivocally denied Dr. Ford’s allegations . . . under penalty of perjury” during a Sept. 17 interview with committee lawyers, Grassley said, adding he was “forthright and emphatic in his testimony” and “fully answered all questions.”
  •  
    • Avatar

MISLEADING CLAIM ALERT: Ford Claims she has 4 people "corroborating" her story. ACTUAL STORY: All 4 people were told AFTER her 2012 therapy sessions (where therapist's notes confirm she NEVER used Kavanaugh's name) about the alleged incident. One of the people is her husband, other 3 are close friends.
  •  
    • Avatar

An other creative attempt by the democratic party to delay these hearings. Remember they are playing a game to delay until the midterm elections in the hope of winning a senate majority so as to invalidate Kavanaugh appointment
  •  
    • Avatar

You might as well say the signed accusations came from Pelosi, Schumer and Gillibrand because that's about how dependable they are. And I'm sure he could get 100 people to come forward on his behalf, so what’s the point. This is just to delay, delay delay until after the midterms.
  •  
    • Avatar

Ford told The Washington Post she was upset when Trump won in 2016, because Kavanaugh was mentioned as a Supreme Court pick. But Kavanaugh wasn’t added to Trump’s list of possibles until November 2017, a full year later.
  •  
    • Avatar

Yet she still pushed forward with her bombshell charge, contacting The Washington Post tip line and Democratic lawmakers, while hiring a Democratic activist lawyer.
  •  
    • Avatar

all these 4 people are saying is that she told them it happened,,,so what. Still no witness or police report or evidence
 1409  217 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Rarest Blood Type from Aliens or Fallen Angels?

The Meaning of WWW 666

The Priory de Sion & Knights Templars