Brett Kavanaugh and Fake News
Yahoo News
passes on Fake News from Rockefeller owned newspapers and services. However, 90
% of the public response posted refutes their claims. It appears the Democrats
are not convincing the public. The Silent Majority the mouse that roared
(remember the book) are RORARING!
Here is an example. Today there was an
article from the Washington Post and USA Today (Liberal Propaganda) about Trump
high court nominee denies new allegation as hearing looms
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A third woman came
forward in a statement to a Senate panel made public on Wednesday accusing
Brett Kavanaugh, President Donald Trump's U.S. Supreme Court nominee, of sexual
misconduct in the 1980s, further inflaming an already contentious confirmation
process. Kavanaugh immediately denied the allegation.
- JeremyA 0
sec ago
Auldaney see
BiblicalScienceNews.blogspot.com Sounds like Jesus trial when the same
bloodline hired false witnesses. How come these loose women are coming forward now?
Check their bank account for cash from Communist George Soros, or Clinton
Foundation
- Frank 2
hr ago
Let us
review! Ford told her Husband and several friends 30 years after alleged
incident took place. Ford sends a letter to her Senator about sic months ago
but it was held back by the Sen. Now a copy of the typewritten letter has
appeared and analysis by an expert indicates either Dr. Ford did not write/type
the letter, it was alterred (different size fonts on different lines) and
numerous simple errors in writing indicating a novice writer not a PHD composed
and typed it. Let us see. If she is willing to raise her right hand and answer
the tough questions without fear of ruining her career with a false statement
under oath then we have something. Personally, I have thought all along it has
been a series of delay tactics and she will not testify under oath. It’s the
day before and we still hear about excuses for not appearing. By the way, I may
be wrong, but, about 6 years ago the late Sen. from Arizona was the GOP nominee
and considering Judge Kavanaugh for a running mate. Interesting?
- Guy
Incognito 5 hr ago
"include
signed documents from Christine Blasey Ford's husband and three friends that
her lawyers sent to the Senate Judiciary Committee." That isn't
CORROBORATION! https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/corroborate The
Definition is:: to support with evidence or authority : make more certain These
are her own, inherently biased friends/relatives, with NO firsthand knowledge
of the accusation, incident, nor anything pertaining to the circumstances
thereof. The statements are nothing more than "well I know her and THINK
this, signed Bob" That isn't even to the level of testimony, it is most
certainly not evidence, and wouldn't even be considered admissible for or
against her accusation more Fake News from the fakenews.
- Anonymous 4
hr ago
"A
woman who has accused President Donald Trump's U.S. Supreme Court nominee,
Brett Kavanaugh, of sexual assault will present senators with sworn statements
from four people to corroborate her allegations, her lawyers said on
Wednesday." "The declarations, first reported by USA Today, include
signed documents from Christine Blasey Ford's husband and three friends"
Wait, last I heard, none of these people were there, and as far as I know, none
knew Kavanaugh at the time. So, can anyone explain how these four "sworn
statements" can "corroborate her allegations?" At best, they are
hearsay, at worst they are total and complete BS.
- ttboy 4
hr ago
Interesting.....But
her story is also growing less believable by the day. Here are eight reasons
why it’s hardly “anti-woman” for senators to question her account at Thursday’s
hearing: 1) For starters, Ford still can’t recall basic details of what she
says was the most traumatic event in her life. Not where the “assault” took
place — she’s not sure whose house it was, or even what street it was on. Nor
when — she’s not even sure of the year, let alone the day and month. Ford’s not
certain how old she was or what grade she was in when she says an older student
violently molested her. (But she doesn’t plead inebriation: She described
having just “one beer” at the party.) 2) Ford concedes she told no one what
happened to her at the time, not even her best friend or mother. That means she
can rely on no contemporaneous witness to corroborate her story. 3) Worse, the
four other people she identified as attending the party, including Kavanaugh,
all deny knowledge of the gathering in question, including Leland Ingham
Keyser, who she calls a “lifelong friend.” Keyser’s lawyer told the Senate
Judiciary Committee: “Simply put, Ms. Keyser does not know Mr. Kavanaugh and
she has no recollection of ever being at a party or gathering where he was
present, with or without Dr. Ford.” The other two potential witnesses — Mark
Judge and Patrick “P.J.” Smyth — also deny any recollection of attending such a
party. The committee took their sworn statements “under penalty of perjury.”
“These witnesses directly contradict Professor Ford’s allegations against Judge
Kavanaugh,” Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley advised Ford’s
attorneys last week. Kavanaugh's accuser offers Senate 4 people to corroborate
claims Second Kavanaugh accuser says she would testify at Senate hearing Why it
was up to Trump to call bull on Kavanaugh allegations Democrats'
'investigation' calls are just code for delay Kavanaugh nomination vote
rescheduled for Friday morning In her original letter to Sen. Dianne Feinstein,
Ford claimed that Kavanaugh talked to Keyser and Smyth right after he assaulted
her. Yet neither shares her memory. This is, to say the least, highly
problematic for her case. No witness corroborates any part of her story. 4) Her
own immediate family doesn’t appear to be backing her up, either. Her mother,
father and two siblings are all conspicuously absent from a letter of support
released by a dozen relatives, mostly on her husband’s side of the family. The
letter attests to her honesty and integrity. “Why didn’t her parents and
brothers sign the letter?” a congressional source familiar with the
investigation wondered. 5) This summer, Ford tried to reach out to old friends
from high school and college to jog her memory. They couldn’t help her. “I’ve
been trying to forget this all my life, and now I’m supposed to remember every
little detail,” Ford complained to one friend in July, according to an account
in The San Jose Mercury News. 6) Yet she still pushed forward with her
bombshell charge, contacting The Washington Post tip line and Democratic
lawmakers, while hiring a Democratic activist lawyer. Ford is also a Democrat,
as well as an anti-Trump marcher, raising questions about the motive and timing
of the allegations along with their veracity. 7) Ford contends that notes her
therapist took in 2012 corroborate her account. But they don’t mention
Kavanaugh. They also point up inconsistencies in her story. For instance, her
shrink noted that Ford told her there were “four boys” in the bedroom, not two
as she now says. The notes also indicate Ford said she was in her “late teens”
when she was assaulted. But Ford now says she may have been only 15. 8) In
another inconsistency, Ford told The Washington Post she was upset when Trump
won in 2016, because Kavanaugh was mentioned as a Supreme Court pick. But
Kavanaugh wasn’t added to Trump’s list of possibles until November 2017, a full
year later. On top of all that, Kavanaugh “unequivocally denied Dr. Ford’s
allegations . . . under penalty of perjury” during a Sept. 17 interview with
committee lawyers, Grassley said, adding he was “forthright and emphatic in his
testimony” and “fully answered all questions.”
- Um
Yeah... 4 hr ago
MISLEADING
CLAIM ALERT: Ford Claims she has 4 people "corroborating" her story.
ACTUAL STORY: All 4 people were told AFTER her 2012 therapy sessions (where
therapist's notes confirm she NEVER used Kavanaugh's name) about the alleged
incident. One of the people is her husband, other 3 are close friends.
- Donald 4
hr ago
An other
creative attempt by the democratic party to delay these hearings. Remember they
are playing a game to delay until the midterm elections in the hope of winning
a senate majority so as to invalidate Kavanaugh appointment
- Bigdog 4
hr ago
You might as
well say the signed accusations came from Pelosi, Schumer and Gillibrand
because that's about how dependable they are. And I'm sure he could get 100
people to come forward on his behalf, so what’s the point. This is just to
delay, delay delay until after the midterms.
- Eric 5
hr ago
Ford told
The Washington Post she was upset when Trump won in 2016, because Kavanaugh was
mentioned as a Supreme Court pick. But Kavanaugh wasn’t added to Trump’s list
of possibles until November 2017, a full year later.
- Eric 5
hr ago
Yet she
still pushed forward with her bombshell charge, contacting The Washington Post
tip line and Democratic lawmakers, while hiring a Democratic activist lawyer.
- eddie 5
hr ago
all these 4
people are saying is that she told them it happened,,,so what. Still no witness
or police report or evidence
1409 217
Comments
Post a Comment