Creationists Accept False Micro-Evolution
The problem with speciation is it is assumed to be part of evolution. And creationists have fallen for this assuming hybrids are adaptation.
There are different kinds of ants, pine trees, palm trees, cats, etc. They did not come from a common ancestor. These do NOT show adaptation, they were designed to live in certain different environments for survival. This is design is not micro-evolution.
God used similar genetic designs to create different kinds of let's say ants. The different kinds of ants eat different food (carnivores or herbivores), live in different kinds of ant hills or wood. Some come into houses, some do not. They are different colors, and size. They do not inter breed.
I suspect creationists have assumed this part of evolution (micro-evolution as opposed to macro-evolution) is a fact. Now a male donkey can mate with a horse and produce a mule. But this never happens in nature. Only man can force this kind of mating because of a form of genetic engineering using similar but different genetic designs.
There are different kinds of ants, pine trees, palm trees, cats, etc. They did not come from a common ancestor. These do NOT show adaptation, they were designed to live in certain different environments for survival. This is design is not micro-evolution.
God used similar genetic designs to create different kinds of let's say ants. The different kinds of ants eat different food (carnivores or herbivores), live in different kinds of ant hills or wood. Some come into houses, some do not. They are different colors, and size. They do not inter breed.
I suspect creationists have assumed this part of evolution (micro-evolution as opposed to macro-evolution) is a fact. Now a male donkey can mate with a horse and produce a mule. But this never happens in nature. Only man can force this kind of mating because of a form of genetic engineering using similar but different genetic designs.
Comments
Post a Comment