Evolutionists are Unscientific

Cam Muskelly commenting on Facebook Biblical Science News to Jeremy Auldaney I gave you about 6 different dinosaur tracksits that are well known in the United States.

Me saying a bad word doesn't show my lack of knowledge. It shows that I and many others are fed up with your ignorance. You can't point to any other site with the same "human footprints" besides that one particular spot.

Now I ask you, why can we not find ANY human tracks in any of those sites. Some of those sites are even bigger then the Puluxy site with miles of dinosaur tracks that have been mapped digitally. There are even new tracksites that are found and are protected by BLM in Utah that come from 

the Cedar Mountain Formation.

Dr. Martin Lockley is a well known expert on dinosaur tracksites. He had done much work on the La Junta tracksite whuch is part of the Morrison Formation in Colorado. Thia site preservers extensive trail of Sauropod dinosaur tracks. Why have there 0 reports of human footprints there? I rub shoulders with Dr. Tony Martin who is a well known Ichnologist (studies trace fossils) who has been to this same site and has mapped it. He actually is in Argentina now as we speak inspecting dinosaur tracks and other trace fossils. He has been to Lark Quarry in Australia which is the biggest dinosaur tracksite on the planet! Why has there been a report on human tracks there?

My Answer: Filthy language has no place for a decent person.

You are right dinosaurs and humans did not live in the same place any more than elephants in Los Angeles.

Lack of evidence does not prove they did not live at the same time. I have seen and discovered some dinosaur sites. As a scientist you do know that the lack of evidence cannot prove anything.

The Coelacanth fish became extinct in the Late Cretaceous strata. (This is not a time period, it is a layer of rock today interpreted to be a Period of time using materialistic assumptions and supported by radiometric methods proven to be totally false by secular scientists.) The Coelacanth is still extinct as far as the fossil record is concerned, but it is very much alive today. Just because a fossil is not found it doesn't prove it wasn't alive during this time. If it could survive so could a dinosaur.

I am not ignorant, I just know more than you do - things you have refused to consider because of your unscientific bias.

The many others who ridicule me on that posting, were hired by the Center for Science Education to attack and suppress the truth. The majority of people do not believe in random irrational Darwinian evolution, they believe there is an intelligent creator, which is necessary to create complex purposeful designs.

The many people attacking me, and many others who agree with me, were directed by an organization to attack me. You do not fool me. They are part of the Satanic Liberal Conspiracy behind the New World Order and the Priory de Scion as described in the Illuminati Plan - the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion where they say they will use Darwinism to undermine Faith.

There is another site of humanoid with dinosaur tracks in Russia. And other sites in dinosaur strata with no dinosaur tracks.

And you ignore the obvious contradiction to your evolution over millions of imaginary years theory. Where are fossil tracks being created today in sedimentary rock with massive worldwide volcanic material raining down during a flood leaving evidence worldwide? Where are the billions of body fossils being created today? There are none. And all these nonsense theories that dinosaur tracks formed near lakes, streams, etc. ignore the fact that these track sites can be traced from California to New Jersey in one layer not to mention other continents with the same flat rock layer and same fossils. No lake or river could create them today. How come there are no mountains or valleys found in sedimentary rock, only flat strata with occasional brief surface features including death layers, tracks, ripples, and mud cracks. And these layers require volcanic minerals to be mixed into the sediment as it was deposited and covered in days, weeks or months by immense floods of water and volcanic ash mud flows while still alive. Then the sediment becomes lithified in that same amount of time. How about the fact that 90% of the dinosaur tracks are carnivorous theropods. Where are the herbivorous dinosaur tracks which should be more numerous than the meat eaters? The fossil record is biased because it is a cataclysmic impact deposit triggered by massive asteroid impacts worldwide.