Water on the Moon?
Here is the
explanation of water on earth and the moon from a materialistic atheist
viewpoint.
“Water deep
inside Earth and the moon may originate from the same source: ancient (carbonaceous)
meteorites, scientists say.”
Jeremy: The
Bible refers to water under the earth in chambers, as the source of the
worldwide Flood. Which geologic evidence shows us was released by asteroid
impacts.
“Water is
vital to life as we know it, with organisms found virtually everywhere there is
water on Earth. When Earth was born,
the ingredients of the planet's water most likely would have formed beyond the
orbit of Earth. As such, all the water on the planet must have come from either
comets or meteorites hurtling inward from the outer solar system.”
Jeremy: This
is speculation, it is most likely they were produced by the destruction of a
planet. God did not create asteroids.
Strange, how
come there is no life on the moon if there is water? So water created life?
That is not what the Bible says. Of course we KNOW it wasn’t created, it just
happened! Well the Bible says he created life on earth and created two lights
to shine on the earth.
Notice they
Capitalize Earth, and do not capitalize the moon? Is it because the sun
represents Baal the sun god symbolized in ancient Egypt as 666 i.e. Satan?
“The findings
hint that water may have existed on Earth before the giant impact the planet
received that created the moon,
and that the moon possessed water from its earliest moments, scientists added. It
remains a mystery exactly how water found within the moon survived this violent
collision, though.”
Jeremy: Like
soft dinosaur tissue and organic remains they have no explanation. And they
give credit to a great impact to the creation of the moon instead of God. Of
course there was water on both from the Beginning.
“Until
recently, scientists thought the interior of the moon was bone-dry, originating
as the moon did from the molten debris of a giant impact of a Mars-size
protoplanet against Earth about 4.5 billion years ago. The heat of this
collision should have baked all the ingredients of water out of the moon.
However, five years ago, the first evidence of hydrogen was discovered in lunar
samples from the Apollo missions. Hydrogen is a main ingredient of water, along
with oxygen. [Water on
the Moon: The Search in Photos]”
Jeremy: Water
is impossible, but they found evidence of it, so it must have got there even if
it is impossible.
Odd some elements on the moon are rare on
earth, and some common on earth are rare on the moon. And there is no crater
that large on earth and how did the moon come together? Also to put something
into orbit for a long time requires it to slow down and curve to create angular
momentum a balance between motion, mass, and distance from the planet. This is
why there are NO meteorites orbiting the earth. Another impossibility, but we
cannot accept the fact that God designed it which is logical.
Below are
the speculations based on the assumption God doesn’t exist, based on ad hock
theories. Anything but the logical truth.
1.
Fission
theory, invented by the astronomer George Darwin (son of Charles). Jeremy:
Darwin was an Illuminated Mason part of the Torch Bearers of Lucifer.
2.
He
proposed that the earth spun so fast that a chunk broke off, with the Pacific
Ocean as the probable scar (or a modification of the theory that had the earth
molten at the time). But this theory is universally discarded today. First, the
moon is too chemically different from the earth; second, the earth could never
have spun fast enough to throw a moon into orbit; and third, the escaping moon
would have been shattered while within the Roche limit.
3. Capture
theory — the moon was wandering through the solar system, and was captured by
Earth’s gravity. But for one approaching body to enter into orbit around
another, it would need to lose a lot of energy, which is why spacecraft sent to
orbit other planets are designed with retro-rockets. Otherwise the approaching
body would have been ‘slingshotted’ rather than captured, a phenomenon the
Voyager probes exploited. Finally, even a successful capture would have
resulted in an elongated comet-like orbit.
4.
Condensation (or co-creation) theory — earth and moon formed at about the same
time from the same portion of the swarm of planetesimals which supposedly
orbited the sun in the early phases of the evolution of the solar
system. However, it’s unlikely that the gravitational attraction could have
been strong enough, and it doesn’t account for the moon’s low iron content.
The
evolutionary astronomer Lissauer affirms that these three theories have
insoluble problems.1 He
even cited an only half-joking statement in a university astronomy class about
20 years ago by Irwin Shapiro: since there were no good (naturalistic)
explanations, the best explanation is that the moon is an illusion! This counts
as strong evidence for the moon’s special creation.2,3
Lissauer’s
article was actually commenting on a paper4 supporting
what evolutionary scientists consider a fourth promising hypothesis for the
origin of the moon, developed during the past decade. It is called the Giant
Impact Hypothesis. This hypothesis suggests that the proto-Earth and a
Mars-sized protoplanet had a glancing collision 4.5 billion years ago. The moon
subsequently formed from the ejecta. A variant of the hypothesis, the
Impact-triggered Fission Hypothesis, propounds that, instead of one giant
impactor, the moon formed from the debris of multiple impacts of smaller
planetesimals. However, recent dynamical and geochemical analyses call the
Giant Impact Hypothesis into question.
Computer
models have been constructed to simulate such a giant impact. Although such
computer models are simplified and depend too much on initial conditions, the
results have strained the hypothesis to the breaking point. One of the new
dynamical results is that the debris from the collision would rain back down
onto Earth instead of remaining in orbit and forming the moon.5 To
hurl the debris far enough from the earth, the impactor would need to be three
times the size of Mars. The results of such a collision are hard to understand,
much less model. And if the moon did form after such a collision, the orbit
would likely be unstable with a distance of only 14,000 miles above the earth
and circling it every two hours. Lissauer also noted the unsolved problem of
losing the excess angular momentum.1
"With a
good degree of certainty, we know that the water came to the moon and Earth
from primitive meteorites now located in the outer parts of the asteroidal
belt," said study lead author Alberto Saal, a geochemist at Brown
University. He and his colleagues detailed their findings online today (May 9)
in the journal Science.
Jeremy: Of
course they do not mention that God created the earth from a ball of water on
day one. Of course water MUST have come from outer reaches of the asteroidal
belt that was garbage left over from the condensation of matter from the great
explosion. By the way explosions do not produce design. And most astronomers
believe that the asteroid belt was produced by the destruction of a planet. The
Bible would agree, because debris floating in space is not created by design,
but by destruction after the fall of Adam. I believe from meteoritics, geology,
paleontology, history and the Bible this happened at the time of Noah’s Flood
about 2348 BC.
“The
simplest explanation for this commonality between the moon and Earth is that
"the Earth from its birth had water," Saal told SPACE.com. "And
it got to the moon during the giant impact without completely being lost by
this event." After the moon-forming impact about 100 million years after
Earth formed, our planet apparently did not receive significantly more water,
he added.”
Jeremy: Of
course, God created water on day one. And no more has been added except for ice
meteorites which are very minor amount. One part per trillions of water atoms.
Typical
science fiction with no evidence to back it up except faith in the natural
creation by random events, and believe that there is no Creator.
Comments
Post a Comment