Secular Science Refutes Evolution
An
evolutionist brainwashed skeptic says, “The last place you expect to meet a
creationist is at the annual American Geophysical Union conference.”
https://boingboing.net/2014/12/19/the-day-i-met-a-creationist-at.html
Really? We
go to secular science events all the time. This is based on the lie that
creation scientists are not interested in ‘real’ science.
This poster
caught his eye at this conference:
A COMPARISON
OF δ13C & pMC VALUES for TEN CRETACEOUS-JURASSIC DINOSAUR BONES
from TEXAS to ALASKA USA, CHINA AND EUROPE WITH THAT OF COAL AND DIAMONDS
PRESENTED IN THE 2003 AGU MEETING
I was approached by a slight, elderly man in glasses. A
name badge declaring him to be Hugh Miller,
the first author on the poster.
Hugh Miller
works with a group of scientists researching Carbon 14 found in dinosaurs and
all other fossils, proving they are not millions of years old, and that they
were fossilized rapidly in days or weeks.
The skeptic: He asked
if I had any questions. I asked if he could just give me a quick summary
of the work. He talked about performing mass spectrometry on samples of
various dinosaur bones that produced age estimates ranging from 15,000 to
50,000 years.
My spidey-sense tingled (Editor’s Note: I think he means
Spiderman in satanic comics based on the legends of Pagan gods). I peered
over his shoulder, searching for bullet points to figure out what was going on
here.
That's when I read it: "Humans, Neanderthals, and Dinosaurs
existed together."
Of course he
knew this was impossible from his brainwashing. Without any evidence from real
science, these assumptions are
accepted as facts.
When
atheists want to refute creation and the Bible they use ridicule because they
have no supporting evidence that has not been refuted by science and logic.
Hugh Miller writes:
The book Grave Secrets of Dinosaurs by Phillip Manning tells
about an amazing Hadrosaur or duck billed dinosaur which has soft flesh
preserved by mineralization. He says in the past many close to complete
dinosaur skeletons have had skin impressions preserved, but paleontologists dug
through it without realizing it was not just matrix it was buried in!
This has puzzled evolutionists because the preservation of soft parts cannot
happen when fossils are buried over millions of years. It would require rapid
catastrophic burial, and very unusual preservation. And organic molecules
should not be preserved over millions of years!
He says recent discoveries have shown that what was
traditionally
accepted as impossible (by evolutionary assumptions), that soft tissue and organic molecules can be preserved. What he does not tell you is that these molecules could not survive for millions of years, and that is a fact. However, he goes on to say they have been preserved for 80 million years!! (Page 245) It esn't dawn on him that maybe they are wrong about how old dinosaurs really are! He says, "Conventional wisdom in the scientific community had regarded this as impossible, but dinosaur discoveries are changing the way we understand the structural molecules of life." Instead of questioning the speculation that thing evolved, and are millions of years they continue to look in all the wrong places.
He goes on about the amazing dinosaur fossils from Liaoning in China (Page 245-6). He claims that they have found feathered dinosaurs!
Sinosauropteryx was the first to show proto-feathers! He later explains these proto-feathers are not feathers, but a fibrous coat of fine filaments. And that it is similar to the down covering hatchling birds to keep them warm. Thus they assume that since other sites with large dinosaurs don't have these because the preservation was not as good elsewhere, thus many other dinosaurs may have had filaments too - I mean proto-feathers.
He does point out the dangers of paleontologists scrambling to find more soft tissue and making blunders. (Page 247) He says, "When people want something badly enough, they often develop the ability to see what they want to see, regardless of what is actually there." He is referring to Archaeoraptor liaoningensis promoted by Stephen A. Czerkas and some prominent paleontologists, which turned out to be a hoax.
I have said before, almost all the mistakes made by paleontologists, geologists, etc. have been based on evolutionary speculation which always leads to wrong conclusions, that are continually being changed as new data comes in to force round data into a square hole. This is a classic example.
Manning doesn't realize he is doing the same thing. The fossils from China that have true feathers that are not arrow dynamic are extinct terrestrial birds. The ones that have filaments are baby dinosaurs, and the filaments keep them warm. The ones with arrow dynamic feathers are true birds. And they were all created separately, but were buried together in the world wide flood and volcanic upheaval after the
asteroid impact.
accepted as impossible (by evolutionary assumptions), that soft tissue and organic molecules can be preserved. What he does not tell you is that these molecules could not survive for millions of years, and that is a fact. However, he goes on to say they have been preserved for 80 million years!! (Page 245) It esn't dawn on him that maybe they are wrong about how old dinosaurs really are! He says, "Conventional wisdom in the scientific community had regarded this as impossible, but dinosaur discoveries are changing the way we understand the structural molecules of life." Instead of questioning the speculation that thing evolved, and are millions of years they continue to look in all the wrong places.
He goes on about the amazing dinosaur fossils from Liaoning in China (Page 245-6). He claims that they have found feathered dinosaurs!
Sinosauropteryx was the first to show proto-feathers! He later explains these proto-feathers are not feathers, but a fibrous coat of fine filaments. And that it is similar to the down covering hatchling birds to keep them warm. Thus they assume that since other sites with large dinosaurs don't have these because the preservation was not as good elsewhere, thus many other dinosaurs may have had filaments too - I mean proto-feathers.
He does point out the dangers of paleontologists scrambling to find more soft tissue and making blunders. (Page 247) He says, "When people want something badly enough, they often develop the ability to see what they want to see, regardless of what is actually there." He is referring to Archaeoraptor liaoningensis promoted by Stephen A. Czerkas and some prominent paleontologists, which turned out to be a hoax.
I have said before, almost all the mistakes made by paleontologists, geologists, etc. have been based on evolutionary speculation which always leads to wrong conclusions, that are continually being changed as new data comes in to force round data into a square hole. This is a classic example.
Manning doesn't realize he is doing the same thing. The fossils from China that have true feathers that are not arrow dynamic are extinct terrestrial birds. The ones that have filaments are baby dinosaurs, and the filaments keep them warm. The ones with arrow dynamic feathers are true birds. And they were all created separately, but were buried together in the world wide flood and volcanic upheaval after the
asteroid impact.
Editor’s
Note: I have discovered that it was an asteroid shower of many thousands of
impacts.
See my book: Mysteries of History Revealed Part 1.
Comments
Post a Comment