New Fossil Bird Theory

      There is another theory about the origin of the Corona virus. It came to earth on a carbonaceous chondrite meteorite that exploded over China. And the same scientists believe an asteroid caused birds to evolve.

BERLIN ARCHAEOPTERYX


EICHSTATT ARCHAEOPTERYX


ARCHAROPTERYX FEATHER
Notice that it is an aerodynamic flight feather just like birds today. How could this evolve from a reptile scale with no transitional forms.


       Of course this is refuted by Dr. Fauci’s emails and other evidence that the virus came from bat virus Gain of Function research to humans as a bioweapon at the Wuhan lab which his organization funded with tax payer money.

       https://www.mysterywire.com/space-science/it-came-from-space-scientist-links-coronavirus-to-meteorite/

       This can join the flat earth, and we did not go to the moon, the face on Mars theories.

       Yes, the theory did come from a well-known scientist, it comes from the Sri Lankan-born British mathematician, astronomer and astrobiologist Dr. Chandra Wickramasinge. It just proves most scientists are science fiction writers.

       Wickramasinge worked with the astronomer Fred Hoyle and published a book in England on their supposed discovery that Archaeopteryx was a hoax.

    Archaeopteryx was found in the same quarry as the foot long dinosaur Compsognathus in the same Jurassic shale.



       I did research on Hoyle’s book and exposed IT AS the hoax:

Archaeopteryx, the Primordial Bird: A Case of Fossil forgery...

https://duckduckgo.com/assets/icons/favicons/amazon.pnghttps://www.amazon.com/Archaeopteryx-Primordial-Bird-Fossil-Forgery/dp/0715406655

       ““Archaeopteryx was a creationist fraud." (Pg. 119-120) Well, you get the idea. Many of their points might have been convincing in the late 19th century, or even the early 20th, but as it is, one is simply left scratching one's head and wondering, "Why in the world did Hoyle and Wickramasinghe go in this direction?"”

       Maybe they are insane?

       Fred Hoyle’s theory is that birds appeared after the great extinction at the end of the Cretaceous when an asteroid hit the Yucatan Peninsula and supposedly killed all the dinosaurs. So there cannot be any birds in the Mesozoic dinosaur strata according to his theory. In spite of the fossils, if their theory is right.

       Hoyle went into detail describing how a hoaxer created the Berlin specimen. He said they took a dinosaur and pressed bird feathers into a cast.

       This is ridiculous, even the atheist evolutionist Stephen J. Gould said this kind of nonsense wastes other scientist’s time in refuting this nonsense instead of doing more productive research.  Gould was right, however I went into evidence he did not use because it comes from work by creation scientists.

       I published an article on it in my Biblical Science News when I used to make a print copy and mailed it to a list of subscribers. A creation scientist who was a PhD geologist and paleontologist and worked for an oil company sent me a donation of $200 praising my in depth article on Hoyle’s book.

       If there are birds in the Mesozoic, where all the dinosaurs are found, then Hoyle’s theory is wrong about the Chicxulub asteroid impact causing evolution of birds from dinosaurs!  That means if Hoyle was right the Berlin specimen of Archaeopteryx, and the Eichstatt specimen and all the many other birds from China are hoaxes too. Not to mention bird trackways.

    Martin Lockley the world expert on Mesozoic (Mostly dinosaur) tracks published a paper:

On the trail of early birds: A review of the fossil footprint record of avian morphological and behavioral evolution.

       “Growing evidence from both the skeletal and track records indicates that the initial avian taxonomic, morphological, and ecological radiations took place around the Jurassic-Cretaceous boundary (about 145 million years ago).”

       “Tracks similar to, and in some cases indistinguishable from, those made by modern shorebirds (Charadriiformes), small ducks (Anseriformes), small herons (Ciconiidae), and even roadrunners (Cuculiformes) appeared, and were even regionally abundant only 15-20 million years thereafter.”

      

       One proof of Hoyle’s hoax was a picture of the Berlin Archaeopteryx which shows a white pale over part of the specimen, Hoyle falsely claimed he took the picture of the real specimen. The page before this picture Hoyle said this hoax was, “like a magician who fools his audience.”

       In his book he had this picture. When I examined it, I looked at it from all angles and turned it upside down, and suddenly I saw it as an illusion. The bones were hollow spaces like a mold which is the reverse of the actual fossil. This was a picture of a CAST of Archaeopteryx.

       Later I was reading the Southern California Paleontological Society newsletter.

       We met for monthly fossil trips and meetings, held at the Los Angeles Museum of Natural History, and at the La Brea Tar Pits Museum. I have been a member for many decades.  

       In their newsletter they described how photographs of molds can be used to appear to be the real fossil for publishing when the real fossil is unavailable.

       You turn the mold upside-down, then shine the light at an angle upwards and it creates an illusion when the picture is turned upside-down. Like pictures of a model of craters on the moon, you can make them look like mounds instead of craters to your perception. This is how your mind interprets three dimensional objects.

       As for Hoyle’s comment, that it was a creationist hoax, it was evolutionists that found and described it, and Darwin praised it as the first real proof of evolution! How wrong can Hoyle and Wickramasinge be!

       Over the years, twelve body fossil specimens of Archaeopteryx and a feather that may belong to it have been found, All of the fossils come from the upper Jurassic lithographic limestone deposits, quarried for centuries, near SolnhofenGermany.

       The fact is evolutionists have not found a mechanism causing evolution. They have used survival of the fittest, mutations, and punctuated equilibria. But they still aren’t sure. And each has is faults that makes it unlikely. They have found no way for any of these to increase the information required to generate new forms. Evolution requires new information for more complexity.  This is why many are turning to the Design Movement. Problem these scientists cannot decide what intelligence created the design.

       This is why I have warned that they will be going back to Paganism for an answer. This is occult theistic evolution, that the gods like Gaia create design. The New Age Religion believes that design comes from and intelligence in matter itself called Gaia, Mother Earth. They believe that the earth is alive. And the New Age has used evidence for UFOs, extraterrestrials, ghosts, spirits, are manifestations of this intelligence. This is why the Pentagon is beginning to release evidence of paranormal events.

       They believe in a Higher Power that is NOT the God of the Bible. Although they will lie about it. They believe there are good and evil other dimensional beings.

        This theory is promoted by movies and Ancient Aliens, false prophets like Hugh Ross Theistic Evolution, UFO cults, Star Gate, Star Wars, Star Trek, etc. 

       This will be the belief promoted by the Antichrist to deceive the world.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Rarest Blood Type from Aliens or Fallen Angels?

Queen Elizabeth Admits She is Not Human!

Bohemian Grove Jesuits & Illuminati